Carl's Place takes SkyTrak on a test drive

Curious how the SkyTrak launch monitor compares to real life range finder distances? Let us show you!

EDITOR'S NOTE: The original SkyTrak launch monitor featured in this piece has been discontinued.

The SkyTrak is a great, affordable launch monitor for indoor golf simulator setups. It provides a ton of useful data without requiring a lot of space as it sits right next to your hitting area.

With the success the Carl’s Place team has had with it indoors, we wanted to take it on a “test drive” at the range where we could compare actual carry distance in real life to what the SkyTrak software told us on our tablet. The questions we hoped to answer were:

  • How accurate is the SkyTrak overall?
  • Is the SkyTrak accurate outdoors?

Before we start, let's make sure we're on the same page about understanding launch monitor data.


On a chilly and breezy November day, we visited the local driving range at Oak Ridge Golf Course in Milton, Wis., with our SkyTrak unit and TrueStrike Hitting Mat. After some troubleshooting, SkyTrak recommended hitting off a mat instead of natural grass to help the unit stay on the same level as the ball and to keep the unit level overall.

Another benefit of using the hitting mat with the SkyTrak is that divots don’t come into play. Since the SkyTrak needs the ball to be placed in the same spot for every shot, we didn’t think our Product Specialist Tim would enjoy hitting out of the same divot every time.

carls-tip

If you’re looking to increase the accuracy of your SkyTrak, we found that placing it on your hitting mat/surface so it is level with your hitting area seems to work best. We attempted using it on a natural grass surface and it struggled to read the ball due to the uneven ground, divots, and other factors.

We focused solely on the carry distance data because too many other factors, such as weather and terrain, play into total distance, ball flight and so on.

“There are so many other factors that come into play with total distance including run and shot shape,” Tim said. “Things like wind, ground firmness, and shape of the terrain will all affect the actual run on the ball compared to what the SkyTrak was giving us.

“The shot shape was occasionally off, but for the most part it got the general flight direction correct. Even though we tried to compensate for the weather in the app, I think the fact that it was a windy day affected the actual flight of the ball compared to what the SkyTrak showed us.”

Tim hit 20 shots with three different clubs that range significantly in club speed and typical carry distance: pitching wedge, 6 iron and driver. Mike, our content writer, was out in the field marking the real-life carry distance with an actual flag stick so Tim could use a rangefinder to get that distance and record the data on our spreadsheet. Our videographer Jon stayed busy capturing all the footage.

SkyTrak Launch Monitor Accuracy Tests

PITCHING WEDGE

Tim started the day with 20 shots with his pitching wedge, where the SkyTrak performed pretty well. 

As you can see in the table below, the simulator carry distance was never less than the actual carry distance. It was a breezy day at the range, and although we plugged in all the weather data into the SkyTrak app, the app could measure the wind effect on the ball differently than what it was in real life. After all, when it’s breezy one minute and calm the next in real life, it would be hard for the simulator to know that. 

But overall, the pitching wedge was on average within 6.82 percent of the actual carry distance in real life. Not too shabby.

Shot Real Life Carry Distance Simulator Carry Distance Yardage Difference % Difference
Shot 1 100 105 5 5.00%
Shot 2 105 122 17 16.19%
Shot 3 112 112 0 0.00%
Shot 4 122 127 5 4.10%
Shot 5 102 113 11 10.78%
Shot 6 107 115 8 7.48%
Shot 7 98 110 12 12.24%
Shot 8 107 117 10 9.35%
Shot 9 107 119 12 11.21%
Shot 10 97 99 2 2.06%
Shot 11 95 103 8 8.42%
Shot 12 107 107 0 0.00%
Shot 13 102 103 1 0.98%
Shot 14 119 135 16 13.45%
Shot 15 110 118 8 7.27%
Shot 16 109 116 7 6.42%
Shot 17 99 106 7 7.07%
Shot 18 99 101 2 2.02%
Shot 19 109 113 4 3.67%
Shot 20 115 125 10 8.70%
    Average 7.25 6.82%

6 IRON

As you will see below, the 6 iron didn’t perform quite as well as the pitching wedge. However, there are many factors that could have contributed to that, including the weather, human error in marking the spot in the field, and so on.

A majority of the shots stayed within 15 yards of the actual carry distance, which is respectable. Some were well over 15 yards different, including one at 42 yards, which seemed to be just a complete misread and we aren’t exactly sure why or how.

This time, it was a mixed bag of whether the carry distance would be longer in real life or on the simulator. On average, though, it was about 10 percent different.

Shot Real Life Carry Distance Simulator Carry Distance Yardage Difference % Difference
Shot 1 147 165 18 12.24%
Shot 2 140 144 4 2.86%
Shot 3 160 175 15 9.38%
Shot 4 160 202 42 26.25%
Shot 5 147 157 10 6.80%
Shot 6 165 172 7 4.24%
Shot 7 140 145 5 3.57%
Shot 8 152 168 16 10.53%
Shot 9 146 155 9 6.16%
Shot 10 140 149 9 6.43%
Shot 11 160 183 23 14.38%
Shot 12 152 184 32 21.05%
Shot 13 143 149 6 4.20%
Shot 14 136 145 9 6.62%
Shot 15 128 133 5 3.91%
Shot 16 140 161 21 15.00%
Shot 17 141 166 25 17.73%
Shot 18 160 187 27 16.88%
Shot 19 144 154 10 6.94%
Shot 20 136 143 7 5.15%
    Average 15 10.02%

DRIVER

Last was the driver, which Tim has admitted is not his most consistent club. Sometimes he missed his aiming point left and other times he missed right. But who doesn’t?

Marking the driver shots in the field was definitely the most difficult for Mike as there was a lot of squinting and exercise involved. However, the data shows that the carry distances were just 4.27 percent different.

Again, it was a mixed bag as to if the real life or simulator carry distance would be longer, but only four shots were more than 15 yards different. Check out the data below.

Driver Real Life Carry Distance Simulator Carry Distance Yardage Difference % Difference
Shot 1 195 196 1 0.51%
Shot 2 200 185 15 7.50%
Shot 3 240 231 9 3.75%
Shot 4 203 191 12 5.91%
Shot 5 214 222 8 3.74%
Shot 6 218 211 7 3.21%
Shot 7 208 224 16 7.69%
Shot 8 207 203 4 1.93%
Shot 9 204 205 1 0.49%
Shot 10 218 210 8 3.67%
Shot 11 223 223 0 0.00%
Shot 12 206 196 10 4.85%
Shot 13 220 220 0 0.00%
Shot 14 200 194 6 3.00%
Shot 15 238 235 3 1.26%
Shot 16 208 227 19 9.13%
Shot 17 178 207 29 16.29%
Shot 18 220 238 18 8.18%
Shot 19 208 208 0 0.00%
Shot 20 215 224 9 4.19%
    Average 8.75 4.27%

SkyTrak Accuracy Test Overall

When looking at the 60 shots overall, the average difference was just more than 10 yards, or 7 percent. Overall, not too shabby despite the few shots that were significantly different. 

It is a good launch monitor under the correct conditions,” Tim said. “Sunlight will definitely affect the unit being able to register a shot. Our initial attempt at doing testing did not work well. I think the issues with shot data being inaccurate could come from human error, and possibly weather conditions affecting ball flight.”

Although the SkyTrak launch monitor is portable and easy to bring with you to the range, it does not seem to perform as well outside as it does inside. That said, take into account that there might be some variation with your indoor numbers as well, but overall, it’s a great golf launch monitor for the price.

We're willing to bet the newer SkyTrak+ will be more accurate!

See SkyTrak Pricing

Search articles by tag: