Titleist Pro V1 balls are one of the best golf balls available, but what about the Titleist Pro V1 RCT balls designed for indoor simulators? Do they truly make a difference for radar-based launch monitors? We tested them.
Pro V1 balls from Titleist are already regarded as one of the best golf balls on the market, and in 2021 the company released a new version called the RCT, which stands for Radar Capture Technology.
What is the Titleist Pro V1 RCT golf ball?
Titleist’s RCT ball is built slightly different to “optimize it for indoor spin capture.” The RCT ball eliminates the need for individual reflective stickers (which can affect accurate readings if the sticker is damaged or misplaced), instead using reflective strips in the outer shell of the ball to more accurately measure readings in indoor simulators.
Why use the Titleist RCT ball indoors?
The accuracy of spin numbers can affect other data that your launch monitor and/or golf simulator software puts out, so getting the most accurate spin numbers is important.
Titleist's website says the "following launch monitor devices have been validated with RCT in an indoor environment":
But first, we cut open both a regular Pro V1 and the RCT version to check out the difference, which were just some reflective strips that were placed in the outer shell of the ball. Otherwise the core and the rest of the ball seemed to be the exact same. (We know a lot of you are cringing at the fact that we wasted two Pro V1 balls, but we had to see it for ourselves!)
Titleist RCT Golf Balls Review - A Carl’s Place Test
In our Pro V1 RCT review, we first, we set up our Mevo+ unit exactly how it is supposed to be set up per the owner’s manual and documented the data (carry distance and back spin) using a regular Pro V1 and an RCT ball. Meanwhile, we had a high-end overhead launch monitor, the Uneekor EYE XO, running as well so we could compare the data from the Mevo+ to the EYE XO on the same shots.
We then repeated the same test with the Garmin R10.
Quick sneak peek: the Pro V1 RCT balls on the Mevo+ were nearly 8% more accurate than a regular Pro V1 ball without metallic dot sticker, and about the same accuracy as a regular Pro V1 ball with the metallic dot stickers.
Mevo+: Data Comparison Using Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls
Using the normal Pro V1 ball with the metallic dot stickers that come with the unit, the Mevo+ was consistently showing carry distance at about 11 yards less than the EYE XO. The back spin numbers were within 250 revolutions per minute on average, with only a couple shots that were significantly different.
Here is the data we captured with the Mevo+ and regular Pro V1 ball and metallic dot stickers.
Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Regular Pro V1 ball and Metallic Dot Stickers
Shot Number
Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards)
EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards)
Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM)
EYE XO Back Spin (RPM)
Carry Distance Dif.
Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1
126.7
135.8
6832
6987
9.1
155
Shot 2
130.9
140.6
6843
7164
9.7
321
Shot 3
125.66
136.1
6088
6051
10.44
37
Shot 4
121.5
133.5
6613
6745
12
132
Shot 5
133.1
145.7
5876
5926
12.6
50
Shot 6
143
151.6
5006
5149
8.6
143
Shot 7
147
157.5
5529
5625
10.5
96
Shot 8
131.2
143.3
4823
4951
12.1
128
Shot 9
133.3
151.8
6986
5353
18.5
1633
Shot 10
138.4
150.4
5520
5646
12
126
Shot 11
145.2
158.4
5556
5749
13.2
193
Shot 12
150.6
162.8
5793
5843
12.2
50
Shot 13
141.6
151
6592
6769
9.4
177
Shot 14
140
153
6982
6716
13
266
Shot 15
150.5
161.1
5148
5289
10.6
141
Shot 16
141.3
155.6
6602
6203
14.3
399
Shot 17
138.7
150.2
6334
6297
11.5
37
Shot 18
144.9
155.3
5745
5936
10.4
191
Shot 19
104.2
118.2
4451
4521
14
70
Shot 20
157.8
166.5
6692
6804
8.7
112
Average
137.278
148.92
6000.55
5986.2
11.642
222.85
Out of curiosity, we also did test the Mevo+ with a regular Pro V1 and no metallic sticker, and the back spin numbers definitely worsened (carry numbers were about the same).
Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Regular Pro V1 ball without Metallic Dot Stickers
Shot Number
Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards)
EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards)
Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM)
EYE XO Back Spin (RPM)
Carry Distance Dif.
Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1
139.8
151.2
5974
6508
11.4
534
Shot 2
140.3
150
5953
6385
9.7
432
Shot 3
134.1
145.3
6163
6383
11.2
220
Shot 4
138
149.6
6064
6433
11.6
369
Shot 5
144
154
5854
6500
10
646
Shot 6
143.7
151.2
5548
6678
7.5
1130
Shot 7
124.6
135.5
6251
6152
10.9
99
Shot 8
130.8
141.9
5708
4894
11.1
814
Shot 9
129.1
137.1
6268
7818
8
1550
Shot 10
126.7
142
5748
4934
15.3
814
Shot 11
148.9
154.5
3618
5957
5.6
2339
Shot 12
144.3
154.9
5919
6144
10.6
225
Shot 13
144.6
152.1
6215
7262
7.5
1047
Shot 14
148.8
156.7
5297
6611
7.9
1314
Shot 15
145.3
154.6
5983
6828
9.3
845
Shot 16
142.6
152.6
6104
6244
10
140
Shot 17
135
145.3
5652
5410
10.3
242
Shot 18
142.7
153
5968
6294
10.3
326
Shot 19
142
150.8
6063
6680
8.8
617
Shot 20
116.5
129.7
5745
3997
13.2
1748
Average
138.09
148.1
5804.75
6205.6
10.01
772.55
With the RCT ball, the Mevo+ was again reading less in carry distance, but the spin numbers ended up being much closer.
Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Pro V1 RCT Ball
Shot Number
Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards)
EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards)
Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM)
EYE XO Back Spin (RPM)
Carry Distance Dif.
Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1
140.6
148.2
6354
6516
7.6
162
Shot 2
136.4
147
6540
6732
10.6
192
Shot 3
140.3
156.1
6249
6149
15.8
100
Shot 4
137.9
146.7
5568
5680
8.8
112
Shot 5
140.4
151.5
5570
5572
11.1
2
Shot 6
114.1
127.7
4599
4663
13.6
64
Shot 7
128.4
141.6
5968
5934
13.2
34
Shot 8
162
153.4
5899
6092
8.6
193
Shot 9
134.4
143.4
6596
6907
9
311
Shot 10
137.4
146.8
6376
6588
9.4
212
Shot 11
133.9
147.7
6004
6105
13.8
101
Shot 12
131.1
139.8
6589
6853
8.7
264
Shot 13
104.1
115.8
4819
5049
11.7
230
Shot 14
136.2
143.7
5115
5145
7.5
30
Shot 15
134.4
142.5
6362
6638
8.1
276
Shot 16
135.4
145.7
5397
5514
10.3
117
Shot 17
133.9
145.8
5370
5576
11.9
206
Shot 18
132.7
143.4
7353
7494
10.7
141
Shot 19
142.1
150.7
6316
6657
8.6
341
Shot 20
151.9
159.3
5244
5511
7.4
267
Average
135.38
144.84
5914.4
6068.75
10.32
167.75
Based on our test, the regular Pro V1 with the metallic dot stickers proved to perform the best with the Pro V1 RCT ball not far behind. See the data below.
Summary Data of Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls Using Mevo+
Pro V1 (no sticker)
EYE XO Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Dif.
Percent Dif.
6205.6
5804.75
400.85
6.46%
Pro V1 (with sticker)
EYE XO Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Dif.
Percent Dif.
5986.2
6000.55
14.35
0.24%
Pro V1 RCT
EYE XO Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Difference
Percent Difference
6068.75
5914.4
154.35
2.54%
Garmin R10: Data Comparison Using Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls
In our original test using RCT balls, the Garmin R10 struggled to even read the ball. We found out that it needed a firmware update, and Garmin recently provided that update, so we ran the test again.
Long story short, the RCT ball did prove to help the Garmin R10 provide more accurate numbers.
Overall, in our first test with just the regular Pro V1, we had similar differences in numbers to the Mevo+. Here’s the data (from the first test):
Take 1: Pre-Firmware Update Accuracy Test of Garmin R10 with Pro V1 RCT Balls
Shot Number
Garmin Carry Distance (Yards)
EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards)
Garmin Back Spin (RPMs)
EYE XO Back Spin (RPMs)
Yardage Dif.
Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1
109
118.9
4980
4517
9.9
463
Shot 2
129
141.2
6905
5635
12.2
1270
Shot 3
142
154.7
7045
5755
12.7
1290
Shot 4
133
144
6736
6183
11
553
Shot 5
142
150.6
6279
5911
8.6
368
Shot 6
147
159.9
5970
5301
12.9
669
Shot 7
144
155.8
6602
5815
11.8
787
Shot 8
158
168.6
6192
5697
10.6
495
Shot 9
126
141
7787
5260
15
2527
Shot 10
146
150.6
5473
6372
4.6
899
Shot 11
157
167.4
6742
6210
10.4
532
Shot 12
141
151.2
6024
5699
10.2
325
Shot 13
148
156.4
6379
6584
8.4
205
Shot 14
131
146.9
7281
5235
15.9
2046
Shot 15
149
156.5
6141
6315
7.5
174
Shot 16
152
161.5
6532
6230
9.5
302
Shot 17
159
167.3
5721
6054
8.3
333
Shot 18
138
152.7
6574
5266
14.7
1308
Shot 19
136
152.5
6815
4577
16.5
2238
Shot 20
152
159
6782
7183
7
401
Average
141.95
152.835
6448
5789.95
10.885
859.25
In a second test at a different time with updated firmware, we tested the Garmin R10 and RCT balls. Here were the results:
Take 2: with Up-To-Date Firmware Accuracy Test of Garmin R10 with Pro V1 RCT Balls
Shot (6 Iron)
Garmin R10 Carry Distance (Yards)
EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards)
Garmin R10 Spin Rate
EYE XO Spin Rate
Carry Distance Dif.
Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1
136
132.6
2852
2881
3.40
29
Shot 2
167
161.8
4975
5038
5.20
63
Shot 3
160
157.3
3743
3909
2.70
166
Shot 4
178
176.6
4672
4834
1.40
162
Shot 5
175
171.3
5062
5266
3.70
204
Shot 6
145
145.7
5759
5888
0.70
129
Shot 7
164
161.2
5462
5615
2.80
153
Shot 8
175
173.4
4851
5079
1.60
228
Shot 9
158
160.1
5647
5906
2.10
259
Shot 10
169
169.9
5590
5764
0.90
174
Shot 11
164
161.4
4880
5018
2.60
138
Shot 12
169
166.2
5109
5248
2.80
139
Shot 13
157
168.4
4205
4525
11.40
320
Shot 14
134
126.4
3488
3628
7.60
140
Shot 15
156
150.8
5514
5589
5.20
75
Shot 16
176
175.7
4258
4497
0.30
239
Shot 17
159
158
5294
5568
1.00
274
Shot 18
162
156.8
5246
5485
5.20
239
Shot 19
169
165.4
4813
5034
3.60
221
Shot 20
157
160.2
4577
4942
3.20
365
Average
161.5
159.96
4799.85
4985.7
3.37
185.85
As you can see, the averages with the RCT ball were much closer than the averages with the regular Pro V1.
As you can see, the RCT ball did prove to provide better data on both the Mevo+ and Garmin R10. Yes, they are pricey, but likely worth the investment. At least in a golf sim you won't have to worry about losing your top-of-the-line balls.
Want better data without the splurge? If you’re willing to tinker with the metallic dot stickers that come with the Mevo+, make sure they’re placed right and don’t fall off, the stickers seem to provide a similar experience as the reflective strip in the RCT ball does. If you don’t want to worry about the stickers falling off, then you’ll likely want to pay the extra money for RCT balls.
Just a reminder: everybody has a different golf simulator setup, and radar launch monitors might perform differently in different setups. This was our test, and someone else’s test might end with different results. If you have done a similar test with the Mevo+ or Garmin R10 (or other radar based launch monitors like the Trackman), feel free to let us know! We’re curious to see how yours turned out!
Below is our original test of the RCT golf ball with Mevo+ and Garmin R10 before Garmin released the firmware update.