Are Titleist Pro V1 RCT balls worth the cost?

Titleist Pro V1 balls are one of the best golf balls available, but what about the Titleist Pro V1 RCT balls designed for indoor simulators? Do they truly make a difference for radar-based launch monitors? We tested them.

Pro V1 balls from Titleist are already regarded as one of the best golf balls on the market, and in 2021 the company released a new version called the RCT, which stands for Radar Capture Technology.

What is the Titleist Pro V1 RCT golf ball?

Titleist’s RCT ball is built slightly different to “optimize it for indoor spin capture.” The RCT ball eliminates the need for individual reflective stickers (which can affect accurate readings if the sticker is damaged or misplaced), instead using reflective strips in the outer shell of the ball to more accurately measure readings in indoor simulators.

Why use the Titleist RCT ball indoors?

The accuracy of spin numbers can affect other data that your launch monitor and/or golf simulator software puts out, so getting the most accurate spin numbers is important.

Titleist's website says the "following launch monitor devices have been validated with RCT in an indoor environment":

  • TrackMan 4
  • Garmin Approach R10
  • Full Swing KIT
  • FlightScope X3
  • FlightScope Mevo+

 

We tested it on two of the radar-based launch monitors we have at Carl’s Place: the FlightScope Mevo+ and Garmin Approach R10.

But first, we cut open both a regular Pro V1 and the RCT version to check out the difference, which were just some reflective strips that were placed in the outer shell of the ball. Otherwise the core and the rest of the ball seemed to be the exact same. (We know a lot of you are cringing at the fact that we wasted two Pro V1 balls, but we had to see it for ourselves!)

Titleist Pro V1 RCT Golf Ball vs. Regular Pro V1
The golf ball shell on the left came from a regular Titleist Pro V1 golf ball, while the one on the right shows the metallic strip inside the Titleist Pro V1 RCT golf ball.

Titleist RCT Golf Balls Review - A Carl’s Place Test

In our Pro V1 RCT review, we first, we set up our Mevo+ unit exactly how it is supposed to be set up per the owner’s manual and documented the data (carry distance and back spin) using a regular Pro V1 and an RCT ball. Meanwhile, we had a high-end overhead launch monitor, the Uneekor EYE XO, running as well so we could compare the data from the Mevo+ to the EYE XO on the same shots.

We then repeated the same test with the Garmin R10.

Quick sneak peek: the Pro V1 RCT balls on the Mevo+ were nearly 8% more accurate than a regular Pro V1 ball without metallic dot sticker, and about the same accuracy as a regular Pro V1 ball with the metallic dot stickers.

Mevo+: Data Comparison Using Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls

Using the normal Pro V1 ball with the metallic dot stickers that come with the unit, the Mevo+ was consistently showing carry distance at about 11 yards less than the EYE XO. The back spin numbers were within 250 revolutions per minute on average, with only a couple shots that were significantly different.

Here is the data we captured with the Mevo+ and regular Pro V1 ball and metallic dot stickers.

Mevo+ Metallic Stickers for Golf Balls

Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Regular Pro V1 ball and Metallic Dot Stickers

Shot Number Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards) EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards) Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM) EYE XO Back Spin (RPM) Carry Distance Dif. Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1 126.7 135.8 6832 6987 9.1 155
Shot 2 130.9 140.6 6843 7164 9.7 321
Shot 3 125.66 136.1 6088 6051 10.44 37
Shot 4 121.5 133.5 6613 6745 12 132
Shot 5 133.1 145.7 5876 5926 12.6 50
Shot 6 143 151.6 5006 5149 8.6 143
Shot 7 147 157.5 5529 5625 10.5 96
Shot 8 131.2 143.3 4823 4951 12.1 128
Shot 9 133.3 151.8 6986 5353 18.5 1633
Shot 10 138.4 150.4 5520 5646 12 126
Shot 11 145.2 158.4 5556 5749 13.2 193
Shot 12 150.6 162.8 5793 5843 12.2 50
Shot 13 141.6 151 6592 6769 9.4 177
Shot 14 140 153 6982 6716 13 266
Shot 15 150.5 161.1 5148 5289 10.6 141
Shot 16 141.3 155.6 6602 6203 14.3 399
Shot 17 138.7 150.2 6334 6297 11.5 37
Shot 18 144.9 155.3 5745 5936 10.4 191
Shot 19 104.2 118.2 4451 4521 14 70
Shot 20 157.8 166.5 6692 6804 8.7 112
Average 137.278 148.92 6000.55 5986.2 11.642 222.85

Shop Launch Monitors

Out of curiosity, we also did test the Mevo+ with a regular Pro V1 and no metallic sticker, and the back spin numbers definitely worsened (carry numbers were about the same).

Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Regular Pro V1 ball without Metallic Dot Stickers

Shot Number Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards) EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards) Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM) EYE XO Back Spin (RPM) Carry Distance Dif. Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1 139.8 151.2 5974 6508 11.4 534
Shot 2 140.3 150 5953 6385 9.7 432
Shot 3 134.1 145.3 6163 6383 11.2 220
Shot 4 138 149.6 6064 6433 11.6 369
Shot 5 144 154 5854 6500 10 646
Shot 6 143.7 151.2 5548 6678 7.5 1130
Shot 7 124.6 135.5 6251 6152 10.9 99
Shot 8 130.8 141.9 5708 4894 11.1 814
Shot 9 129.1 137.1 6268 7818 8 1550
Shot 10 126.7 142 5748 4934 15.3 814
Shot 11 148.9 154.5 3618 5957 5.6 2339
Shot 12 144.3 154.9 5919 6144 10.6 225
Shot 13 144.6 152.1 6215 7262 7.5 1047
Shot 14 148.8 156.7 5297 6611 7.9 1314
Shot 15 145.3 154.6 5983 6828 9.3 845
Shot 16 142.6 152.6 6104 6244 10 140
Shot 17 135 145.3 5652 5410 10.3 242
Shot 18 142.7 153 5968 6294 10.3 326
Shot 19 142 150.8 6063 6680 8.8 617
Shot 20 116.5 129.7 5745 3997 13.2 1748
Average 138.09 148.1 5804.75 6205.6 10.01 772.55

With the RCT ball, the Mevo+ was again reading less in carry distance, but the spin numbers ended up being much closer.

Accuracy Test of Mevo+ with Pro V1 RCT Ball

Shot Number Mevo+ Carry Distance (Yards) EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards) Mevo+ Back Spin (RPM) EYE XO Back Spin (RPM) Carry Distance Dif. Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1 140.6 148.2 6354 6516 7.6 162
Shot 2 136.4 147 6540 6732 10.6 192
Shot 3 140.3 156.1 6249 6149 15.8 100
Shot 4 137.9 146.7 5568 5680 8.8 112
Shot 5 140.4 151.5 5570 5572 11.1 2
Shot 6 114.1 127.7 4599 4663 13.6 64
Shot 7 128.4 141.6 5968 5934 13.2 34
Shot 8 162 153.4 5899 6092 8.6 193
Shot 9 134.4 143.4 6596 6907 9 311
Shot 10 137.4 146.8 6376 6588 9.4 212
Shot 11 133.9 147.7 6004 6105 13.8 101
Shot 12 131.1 139.8 6589 6853 8.7 264
Shot 13 104.1 115.8 4819 5049 11.7 230
Shot 14 136.2 143.7 5115 5145 7.5 30
Shot 15 134.4 142.5 6362 6638 8.1 276
Shot 16 135.4 145.7 5397 5514 10.3 117
Shot 17 133.9 145.8 5370 5576 11.9 206
Shot 18 132.7 143.4 7353 7494 10.7 141
Shot 19 142.1 150.7 6316 6657 8.6 341
Shot 20 151.9 159.3 5244 5511 7.4 267
Average 135.38 144.84 5914.4 6068.75 10.32 167.75

Shop Launch Monitors

Based on our test, the regular Pro V1 with the metallic dot stickers proved to perform the best with the Pro V1 RCT ball not far behind. See the data below.

Summary Data of Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls Using Mevo+

Pro V1 (no sticker)
EYE XO Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Dif. Percent Dif.
6205.6 5804.75 400.85 6.46%
Pro V1 (with sticker)
EYE XO Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Dif. Percent Dif.
5986.2 6000.55 14.35 0.24%
Pro V1 RCT
EYE XO Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Mevo+ Average
Back Spin (RPMs)
Absolute Difference Percent Difference
6068.75 5914.4 154.35 2.54%

Garmin R10: Data Comparison Using Pro V1 vs. RCT Balls

In our original test using RCT balls, the Garmin R10 struggled to even read the ball. We found out that it needed a firmware update, and Garmin recently provided that update, so we ran the test again.

Long story short, the RCT ball did prove to help the Garmin R10 provide more accurate numbers. 

Overall, in our first test with just the regular Pro V1, we had similar differences in numbers to the Mevo+. Here’s the data (from the first test):

Take 1: Pre-Firmware Update
Accuracy Test of Garmin R10 with Pro V1 RCT Balls

Shot Number Garmin
Carry Distance
(Yards)
EYE XO
Carry Distance
(Yards)
Garmin
Back Spin
(RPMs)
EYE XO Back Spin
(RPMs)
Yardage Dif. Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1 109 118.9 4980 4517 9.9 463
Shot 2 129 141.2 6905 5635 12.2 1270
Shot 3 142 154.7 7045 5755 12.7 1290
Shot 4 133 144 6736 6183 11 553
Shot 5 142 150.6 6279 5911 8.6 368
Shot 6 147 159.9 5970 5301 12.9 669
Shot 7 144 155.8 6602 5815 11.8 787
Shot 8 158 168.6 6192 5697 10.6 495
Shot 9 126 141 7787 5260 15 2527
Shot 10 146 150.6 5473 6372 4.6 899
Shot 11 157 167.4 6742 6210 10.4 532
Shot 12 141 151.2 6024 5699 10.2 325
Shot 13 148 156.4 6379 6584 8.4 205
Shot 14 131 146.9 7281 5235 15.9 2046
Shot 15 149 156.5 6141 6315 7.5 174
Shot 16 152 161.5 6532 6230 9.5 302
Shot 17 159 167.3 5721 6054 8.3 333
Shot 18 138 152.7 6574 5266 14.7 1308
Shot 19 136 152.5 6815 4577 16.5 2238
Shot 20 152 159 6782 7183 7 401
Average 141.95 152.835 6448 5789.95 10.885 859.25

Shop Launch Monitors

In a second test at a different time with updated firmware, we tested the Garmin R10 and RCT balls. Here were the results:

Take 2: with Up-To-Date Firmware
Accuracy Test of Garmin R10 with Pro V1 RCT Balls

Shot (6 Iron) Garmin R10 Carry Distance (Yards) EYE XO Carry Distance (Yards) Garmin R10 Spin Rate EYE XO Spin Rate Carry Distance Dif. Back Spin Dif.
Shot 1 136 132.6 2852 2881 3.40 29
Shot 2 167 161.8 4975 5038 5.20 63
Shot 3 160 157.3 3743 3909 2.70 166
Shot 4 178 176.6 4672 4834 1.40 162
Shot 5 175 171.3 5062 5266 3.70 204
Shot 6 145 145.7 5759 5888 0.70 129
Shot 7 164 161.2 5462 5615 2.80 153
Shot 8 175 173.4 4851 5079 1.60 228
Shot 9 158 160.1 5647 5906 2.10 259
Shot 10 169 169.9 5590 5764 0.90 174
Shot 11 164 161.4 4880 5018 2.60 138
Shot 12 169 166.2 5109 5248 2.80 139
Shot 13 157 168.4 4205 4525 11.40 320
Shot 14 134 126.4 3488 3628 7.60 140
Shot 15 156 150.8 5514 5589 5.20 75
Shot 16 176 175.7 4258 4497 0.30 239
Shot 17 159 158 5294 5568 1.00 274
Shot 18 162 156.8 5246 5485 5.20 239
Shot 19 169 165.4 4813 5034 3.60 221
Shot 20 157 160.2 4577 4942 3.20 365
Average 161.5 159.96 4799.85 4985.7 3.37 185.85

As you can see, the averages with the RCT ball were much closer than the averages with the regular Pro V1. 

Our updated Garmin R10 test with RCT balls can be viewed as part of our Garmin R10 vs. SkyTrak video.

Are the Pro V1 RCT golf balls worth it?

Pro V1 RCT balls are one of the most expensive golf balls on the market - but for good reason.

As you can see, the RCT ball did prove to provide better data on both the Mevo+ and Garmin R10. Yes, they are pricey, but likely worth the investment. At least in a golf sim you won't have to worry about losing your top-of-the-line balls.

Want better data without the splurge? If you’re willing to tinker with the metallic dot stickers that come with the Mevo+, make sure they’re placed right and don’t fall off, the stickers seem to provide a similar experience as the reflective strip in the RCT ball does. If you don’t want to worry about the stickers falling off, then you’ll likely want to pay the extra money for RCT balls.

Just a reminder: everybody has a different golf simulator setup, and radar launch monitors might perform differently in different setups. This was our test, and someone else’s test might end with different results. If you have done a similar test with the Mevo+ or Garmin R10 (or other radar based launch monitors like the Trackman), feel free to let us know! We’re curious to see how yours turned out!

Below is our original test of the RCT golf ball with Mevo+ and Garmin R10 before Garmin released the firmware update.

Shop Launch Monitors

Search articles by tag: